Moskvitch 2141 1994 vs Rover 400 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 85 HP | 112 HP | |
Torque: | 130 NM | 145 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
Rover 400 is a more dynamic driving. Moskvitch 2141 engine produces 27 HP less power than Rover 400, whereas torque is 15 NM less than Rover 400. Due to the lower power, Moskvitch 2141 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.1 | |
The Rover 400 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Moskvitch 2141 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 400, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Moskvitch 2141 could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 770 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
Rover 400 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Moskvitch 2141 is 3 cm longer than the Rover 400, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 720 litres | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`640 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Rover 400 has
| |