Moskvitch 2141 1994 vs Dacia Logan 2005
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.7 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 85 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 130 NM | 127 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 seconds | 12 seconds | |
|
Dacia Logan is a more dynamic driving. Moskvitch 2141 engine produces 2 HP less power than Dacia Logan, but torque is 3 NM more than Dacia Logan. Due to the lower power, Moskvitch 2141 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.2 | |
|
The Dacia Logan is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Moskvitch 2141 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dacia Logan, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Moskvitch 2141 could require 105 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 900 km on highway | 870 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.53 m | |
| Moskvitch 2141 is 10 cm longer than the Dacia Logan, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 510 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`480 | 1`540 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Dacia Logan has
| |