Moskvitch 2141 1987 vs Seat Toledo 1995
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 72 HP | 75 HP | |
Torque: | 106 NM | 125 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 13.3 seconds | |
Seat Toledo is a more dynamic driving. Moskvitch 2141 engine produces 3 HP less power than Seat Toledo, whereas torque is 19 NM less than Seat Toledo. Due to the lower power, Moskvitch 2141 reaches 100 km/h speed 4.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.3 | |
The Seat Toledo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Moskvitch 2141 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Toledo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Moskvitch 2141 could require 90 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Seat Toledo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.35 m | 4.32 m | |
Width: | 1.69 m | 1.66 m | |
Height: | 1.40 m | 1.42 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Moskvitch 2141 is 3 cm longer than the Seat Toledo, 3 cm wider, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | no data | 10.5 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | 1`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | low | |
Average price (€): | no data | 1000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Seat Toledo has
| |