Moskvitch 2141 1987 vs VAZ 2105 1980
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 HP | 71 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 104 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 18 seconds | 17 seconds | |
| Moskvitch 2141 engine produces 1 HP more power than VAZ 2105, whereas torque is 2 NM more than VAZ 2105. Despite the higher power, Moskvitch 2141 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 9.2 | |
|
The Moskvitch 2141 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Moskvitch 2141 consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the VAZ 2105, which means that by driving the Moskvitch 2141 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 39 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 420 km in combined cycle | |
| Moskvitch 2141 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Moskvitch 2141) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (VAZ 2105) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.13 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Moskvitch 2141 is larger, but lower. Moskvitch 2141 is 22 cm longer than the VAZ 2105, 7 cm wider, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 345 litres | |
|
Moskvitch 2141 has more luggage capacity. Moskvitch 2141 has 25 litres more trunk space than the VAZ 2105. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`465 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Moskvitch 2141 has
|
VAZ 2105 has
| |