Moskvitch 2141 1986 vs VAZ 2107 1982

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Moskvitch 2141
1986 - 1999
VAZ 2107
1982 - 2012
Body: HatchbackSedan
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual Manual
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
Moskvitch 2141 is available with front wheel drive, while VAZ 2107 can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 1.5 - 1.71.3 - 1.7

Performance

Power: 72 - 85 HP64 - 140 HP
Torque: 106 - 130 NM92 - 186 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 14.9 - 18 seconds9 - 25 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.97.2 - 11.0
Moskvitch 2141 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than VAZ 2107.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.35 m4.15 m
Width: 1.69 m1.62 m
Height: 1.40 m1.44 m
Moskvitch 2141 is larger, but slightly lower.
Moskvitch 2141 is 21 cm longer than the VAZ 2107, 7 cm wider, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres325 litres
Moskvitch 2141 has more luggage capacity.
Moskvitch 2141 has 45 litres more trunk space than the VAZ 2107.
Turning diameter: no datano data
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`467~ 1`430
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): no data2200
Pros and Cons: Moskvitch 2141 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv