Moskvitch 2141 1986 vs Rover 400 1995
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.7 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Rover 400 is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 - 85 HP | 75 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 130 NM | 117 - 210 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 - 18 seconds | 9.5 - 14 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 5.3 - 8.6 | |
|
Moskvitch 2141 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Rover 400. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.39 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Moskvitch 2141 is 3 cm longer than the Rover 400, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 7320 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.3 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`467 | ~ 1`642 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Moskvitch 2141 has
|
Rover 400 has
| |