Moskvitch 2141 1986 vs Nissan X-Trail 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual/Automatic | |
| Moskvitch 2141 is available only with manual gearbox, whereas Nissan X-Trail has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Moskvitch 2141 is available only with front wheel drive, while Nissan X-Trail can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 - 1.7 (petrol) | 2.0 - 2.5 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Nissan X-Trail is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 72 - 85 HP | 136 - 165 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 - 130 NM | 192 - 314 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.9 - 18 seconds | 9.9 - 13.1 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.9 | 7.1 - 10.0 | |
|
Moskvitch 2141 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Nissan X-Trail. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.35 m | 4.51 m | |
| Width: | 1.69 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.40 m | 1.70 m | |
|
Moskvitch 2141 is smaller. Moskvitch 2141 is 16 cm shorter than the Nissan X-Trail, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Moskvitch 2141 is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 410 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1841 litres | |
|
Nissan X-Trail has more luggage space. Moskvitch 2141 has 40 litres less trunk space than the Nissan X-Trail. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 10.6 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`467 | ~ 2`009 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Moskvitch 2141 has
|
Nissan X-Trail has
| |