Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 159 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 260 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander engine produces 50 HP less power than Renault Kadjar, whereas torque is 115 NM less than Renault Kadjar. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | no data | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 55 litres | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 310'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Megane, Dacia Duster, Dacia Dokker | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Renault Kadjar engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Kadjar 2018 1.3 engine: The engine is reliable. However, in the event of problems, getting spare parts and repairs can be difficult. Fuel consumption is reasonable, and the engine is not too demanding on fuel quality. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Xpander is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | 5 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 472 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`889 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |