Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Kia Sportage 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 135 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander engine produces 26 HP less power than Kia Sportage, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Kia Sportage. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.8 | |
|
The Kia Sportage is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Xpander consumes 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Sportage, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Xpander could require 285 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| Kia Sportage gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 310'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Kia Sportage engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 21 years | 16 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Ceed, Hyundai Tucson, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine: The engine is generally a reliable design and not particularly sensitive to fuel quality. However, it is prone to several common issues. One of the most widespread problems is the rapid buildup of carbon ... More about Kia Sportage 2010 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.44 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.69 m | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander is 4 cm longer than the Kia Sportage, 11 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 564 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 564 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1353 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Kia Sportage. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`830 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Kia Sportage has
| |