Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Hyundai Tucson 2015
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.5 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 132 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 161 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander engine produces 23 HP less power than Hyundai Tucson, whereas torque is 16 NM less than Hyundai Tucson. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 6.7 | |
|
The Hyundai Tucson is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Xpander consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Tucson, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Xpander could require 300 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 45 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 510 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| Hyundai Tucson gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | 172 mm (6.8 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Xpander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Xpander version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 20 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Colt, Smart ForFour | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Kia Ceed, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai i30 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.65 m | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander and Hyundai Tucson are practically the same length. | |||
| Seats: | 7 seats | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 513 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | no data | 513 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1503 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Hyundai Tucson. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 1`895 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 15 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Xpander has
|
Hyundai Tucson has
| |