Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Volkswagen T-Cross 2019
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.0 - 1.6 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Volkswagen T-Cross is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 95 - 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 175 - 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.2 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 4.2 - 6.4 | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen T-Cross. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.58 m | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander is 37 cm longer than the Volkswagen T-Cross, 1 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 12 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1281 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen T-Cross. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`773 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 14 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Xpander has
|
Volkswagen T-Cross has
| |