Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 116 - 159 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 240 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | no data | |
| Ground clearance: | 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Xpander is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1478 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`970 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 18 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Xpander has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |