Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
Mitsubishi Xpander
2017 - 2021
Renault Kadjar
2018 -
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Mitsubishi Xpander is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.5 (petrol)1.3 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel)
Both cars are available with petrol engines. Renault Kadjar is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types.

Performance

Power: 109 HP116 - 159 HP
Torque: 145 NM240 - 340 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: n/a seconds9.3 - 11.9 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.7no data
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
Ground clearance: 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches)200 mm (7.9 inches)

Dimensions

Length: 4.48 m4.49 m
Width: 1.75 m1.84 m
Height: 1.70 m1.61 m
Mitsubishi Xpander is smaller, but higher.
Mitsubishi Xpander is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 9 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data472 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1478 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar.
Gross weight (kg): no data~ 1`970
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): no data18 000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Xpander has
  • only petrol engines available
Renault Kadjar has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • petrol and diesel engines available
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv