Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Renault Kadjar 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander is available only with front wheel drive, while Renault Kadjar can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.3 - 1.7 (petrol, diesel) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. Renault Kadjar is available also with diesel engines. Diesel engines typically offer better fuel efficiency and higher torque compared to other engine types. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 116 - 159 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 240 - 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 9.3 - 11.9 seconds | |
| In general, Renault Kadjar are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Mitsubishi Xpander. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 5.0 - 6.8 | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander petrol engines consumes on average 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Renault Kadjar. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches) | 200 mm (7.9 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.49 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Xpander is 1 cm shorter than the Renault Kadjar, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 472 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1478 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Kadjar. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 1`970 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 16 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Xpander has
|
Renault Kadjar has
| |