Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Mazda CX-3 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Mitsubishi Xpander is available only with front wheel drive, while Mazda CX-3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.8 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 109 HP | 115 - 150 HP | |
Torque: | 145 NM | 195 - 270 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 8.8 - 11 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 4.4 - 7.0 | |
Mitsubishi Xpander petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda CX-3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Ground clearance: | 200 - 205 mm (7.9 - 8.1 inches) | 155 mm (6.1 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Xpander can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.48 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.70 m | 1.54 m | |
Mitsubishi Xpander is 20 cm longer than the Mazda CX-3, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Xpander is 17 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1260 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 0.2 metres less than that of the Mazda CX-3. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 1`765 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | high | |
Average price (€): | no data | 17 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Xpander has
|
Mazda CX-3 has
| |