Mitsubishi Xpander 2017 vs Audi Q3 2018
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Mitsubishi Xpander is available only with front wheel drive, while Audi Q3 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. | |||
| Engines: | 1.5 (petrol) | 1.4 - 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 109 HP | 150 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 145 NM | 250 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 6.3 - 9.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 4.9 - 7.6 | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander petrol engines consumes on average 1.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi Q3. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.48 m | 4.48 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.70 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Xpander is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Xpander and Audi Q3 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1525 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Xpander is 1.4 metres less than that of the Audi Q3, which means Mitsubishi Xpander can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`191 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 30 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Xpander has
|
Audi Q3 has
| |