Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 vs Renault Espace 2000
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 98 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 190 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 4 HP more power than Renault Espace, whereas torque is 25 NM more than Renault Espace. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Espace, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 76 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1150 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1330 km on highway | ||
| Renault Espace gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Renault Scenic, Renault Clio, Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.69 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 49 cm shorter than the Renault Espace, 9 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 17 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | 5 seats | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 2850 litres | |
| The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Espace (by 1480 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.8 metres less than that of the Renault Espace, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`270 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Espace has
| |