Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 112 HP | |
| Torque: | 174 NM | 157 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10.6 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 engine produces 10 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star 2002, whereas torque is 17 NM more than Mitsubishi Space Star 2002. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.3 | 7.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.6 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2002, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 750 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
| 720 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Galant | Used also on Mitsubishi Galant | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.05 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 is 2 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2002, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`700 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |