Mitsubishi Space Star 2001 vs Renault Scenic 2001
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 148 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 13.8 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 12 HP less power than Renault Scenic, but torque is 2 NM more than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.2 | 7.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 105 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
| 830 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Renault Laguna, Renault Clio, Dacia Duster | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Renault Scenic might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine: The engine is very robust and long-lived, up to half a million kilometres, and can suffer minor damage, but overall it is quite reliable. Fuel consumption is relatively high for these engines, but they are not ... More about Renault Scenic 2001 1.6 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 14 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`250 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |