Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 vs Mazda Premacy 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 100 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 11.8 seconds | |
|
Mazda Premacy is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 18 HP less power than Mazda Premacy, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Mazda Premacy. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 8.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Premacy. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 58 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 960 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mazda Premacy engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Mazda 626, Mazda 323 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.30 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.57 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 27 cm shorter than the Mazda Premacy, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 420 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1848 litres | |
|
Mazda Premacy has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 50 litres less trunk space than the Mazda Premacy. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mazda Premacy (by 478 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.2 metres less than that of the Mazda Premacy, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`760 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mazda Premacy has
| |