Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2000

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
1998 - 2000
Nissan Almera Tino
2000 - 2003
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 122 HP114 HP
Torque: 174 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.4 seconds12.7 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 8 HP more power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 16 NM more than Nissan Almera Tino. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.07.8
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway950 km on highway
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 350'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 23 years8 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi GalantInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera, Nissan Sentra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.03 m4.26 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.52 m1.61 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 23 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litres1950 litres
Nissan Almera Tino has more luggage space.
Mitsubishi Space Star has 70 litres less trunk space than the Nissan Almera Tino. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Nissan Almera Tino (by 580 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.6 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.8 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera Tino, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`830
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 8001000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • timing belt engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Nissan Almera Tino has
  • timing chain engine
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv