Mitsubishi Space Star 1998 vs Renault Kangoo 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 114 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 14.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 11 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 3 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 7.5 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 19 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | Used also on Dacia Logan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.03 m | 4.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.66 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.84 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 32 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 650 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 2600 litres | |
|
Renault Kangoo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Mitsubishi Space Star has 280 litres less trunk space than the Renault Kangoo. This could mean that the Mitsubishi Space Star uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Kangoo (by 1230 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.6 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.2 metres less than that of the Renault Kangoo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`655 | 1`640 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Kangoo has
| |