Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Renault Scenic 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 300 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Renault Scenic. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.9 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1030 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1200 km on highway | ||
| 930 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.62 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 21 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1840 litres | |
|
Renault Scenic has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 60 litres less trunk space than the Renault Scenic. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Scenic (by 470 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Power steering: | Hydraulic power steering | Electric power steering | |
| Hydraulic power steering is technologically more complex, louder, increases fuel consumption and requires more servicing. It has the advantages of more power, less strain on the car's electrical system and better feedback (feeling) when steering. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 2`010 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |