Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Hyundai Matrix 2004

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2002 - 2004
Hyundai Matrix
2004 - 2008
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 115 HP103 HP
Torque: 265 NM141 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 secondsn/a seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 12 HP more power than Hyundai Matrix, whereas torque is 124 NM more than Hyundai Matrix.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.5no data
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres55 litres
930 km with real consumption670 km with real consumption

Engines

Engine production duration: 8 years12 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi CarismaInstalled on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: noyes
The Hyundai Matrix engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.02 m
Width: 1.72 m1.74 m
Height: 1.52 m1.64 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 12 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litresno data
Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix.
Turning diameter: 10.4 metersno data
Gross weight (kg): 1`7301`800
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 12001000
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more power
  • roomier boot
Hyundai Matrix has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv