Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Ford Fusion 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 102 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 204 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 12.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 12 HP more power than Ford Fusion, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Ford Fusion. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Ford Fusion is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Fusion. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 1190 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm longer than the Ford Fusion, width is practically the same , while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 337 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1175 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Star has 33 litres more trunk space than the Ford Fusion. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 195 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Fusion, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`730 | 1`675 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Ford Fusion has
| |