Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Renault Scenic 2002
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 164 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
|
Renault Scenic is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 3 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Renault Scenic. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 7.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Renault Scenic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Renault Scenic gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 7 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Galant | Used also on Renault Megane | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.17 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.68 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 12 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 16 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`350 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Scenic has
| |