Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 174 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 12.4 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 engine produces 10 HP less power than Mitsubishi Space Star 2000, whereas torque is 17 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star 2000. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.5 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2000, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 could require 75 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2000. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
| 640 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 23 years | 23 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Galant | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Galant | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 is 2 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2000, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
no data | 1370 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 is 0.8 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Space Star 2000, which means Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`600 kg | 1`730 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has
| |