Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Hyundai Matrix 2004
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 141 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.5 seconds | 12.7 seconds | |
|
Hyundai Matrix is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 5 HP less power than Hyundai Matrix, but torque is 9 NM more than Hyundai Matrix. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 8.0 | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Matrix, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Hyundai Getz, Hyundai Elantra, Hyundai Accent, Kia RIO, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Matrix might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.64 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm longer than the Hyundai Matrix, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 12 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1370 litres | 1284 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres more trunk space than the Hyundai Matrix. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 86 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`690 | 1`800 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Hyundai Matrix has
| |