Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Opel Meriva 2003

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2002 - 2004
Opel Meriva
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 98 HP84 HP
Torque: 150 NM138 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds14.5 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 14 HP more power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 12 NM more than Opel Meriva. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.8
Real fuel consumption: 7.3 l/100km8.5 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle660 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway830 km on highway
750 km with real consumption610 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years4 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi LancerUsed also on Opel Astra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.04 m
Width: 1.72 m1.69 m
Height: 1.52 m1.62 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 370 litres350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
1370 litres1410 litres
Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres more trunk space than the Opel Meriva. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Opel Meriva (by 40 litres).
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6901`805
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 12001200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv