Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 28 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Toyota Corolla Verso. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 3.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |