Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 vs Fiat Doblo 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 82 HP | 103 HP | |
| Torque: | 120 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 14.2 seconds | 12.6 seconds | |
|
Fiat Doblo is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 21 HP less power than Fiat Doblo, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Fiat Doblo. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 8.6 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.0 l/100km | 8.3 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 820 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
| 780 km with real consumption | 720 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Fiat Doblo engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | Used also on Fiat Stilo | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Fiat Doblo engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 11 cm shorter than the Fiat Doblo, 1 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.1 metres less than that of the Fiat Doblo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1200 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Fiat Doblo has
| |