Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Renault Scenic 2003

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Renault Scenic
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel1.9 Diesel

Performance

Power: 115 HP120 HP
Torque: 265 NM300 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds12.1 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 5 HP less power than Renault Scenic, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Renault Scenic. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.6 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.55.8
Real fuel consumption: 6.0 l/100km6.5 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Scenic.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle1030 km in combined cycle
910 km with real consumption920 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.26 m
Width: 1.72 m1.80 m
Height: 1.52 m1.62 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 21 cm shorter than the Renault Scenic, 8 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data430 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1840 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.7 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.3 metres less than that of the Renault Scenic.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3002`010
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv