Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Renault Kangoo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 61 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 17.9 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 54 HP more power than Renault Kangoo, whereas torque is 135 NM more than Renault Kangoo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 7.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Kangoo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 920 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.04 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.67 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.82 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm longer than the Renault Kangoo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 30 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 650 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`200 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | low | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
| |