Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Opel Combo 2004
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 1.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 70 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 170 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 17 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 45 HP more power than Opel Combo, whereas torque is 95 NM more than Opel Combo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 6.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.0 l/100km | 5.6 l/100km | |
|
The Opel Combo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 60 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Opel Combo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 52 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 1010 km in combined cycle | |
| 910 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ... More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 1.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.32 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.69 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.80 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 27 cm shorter than the Opel Combo, 4 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 28 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 455 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.8 metres less than that of the Opel Combo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`815 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Opel Combo has
| |