Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.5 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 21 HP less power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 39 NM less than Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 6.6 | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1000 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 8 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi Carisma | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Nissan X-Trail, Nissan Almera, Nissan Primera | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.61 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1950 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera Tino. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`300 | 1`940 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Nissan Almera Tino has
| |