Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Nissan Almera Tino 2003

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Nissan Almera Tino
2003 - 2006
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.9 Diesel2.2 Diesel
Camshaft drive: Timing beltDouble-row timing chain
Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors.

Performance

Power: 115 HP112 HP
Torque: 265 NM235 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.5 seconds12.2 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive.
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 3 HP more power than Nissan Almera Tino, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Nissan Almera Tino. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.56.4
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Nissan Almera Tino, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres60 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle930 km in combined cycle
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km390'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 8 years3 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 11 other car models, including Volvo V40, Renault Laguna, Renault Scenic, Volvo S40, Mitsubishi CarismaUsed also on Nissan Almera
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect.
Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 1.9 engine: Long-lasting and fuel-efficient engine. Maintaining oil change and maintenance intervals is essential for a long engine life, as poor or untimely oil changes can result in turbine and oil pump damage, followed ...  More about Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 1.9 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.26 m
Width: 1.72 m1.76 m
Height: 1.52 m1.61 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 21 cm shorter than the Nissan Almera Tino, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1950 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.6 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.2 metres less than that of the Nissan Almera Tino.
Gross weight (kg): 1`3001`940
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • timing belt engine
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • lower price
Nissan Almera Tino has
  • timing chain engine
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv