Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Opel Meriva 2003

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Opel Meriva
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.8 Petrol1.8 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 112 HP125 HP
Torque: 157 NM170 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.6 seconds11.3 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 13 HP less power than Opel Meriva, whereas torque is 13 NM less than Opel Meriva. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.77.9
Real fuel consumption: 7.8 l/100km8.9 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle650 km in combined cycle
700 km with real consumption580 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km420'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 23 years9 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi GalantInstalled on at least 4 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra, Opel Signum
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.04 m
Width: 1.72 m1.69 m
Height: 1.52 m1.62 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1410 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva.
Gross weight (kg): 1`4001`835
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10001200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Opel Meriva has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv