Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Honda Civic 2001
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 112 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 157 NM | 152 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.6 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 2 HP more power than Honda Civic, whereas torque is 5 NM more than Honda Civic. Despite the higher power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.7 | 6.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.2 l/100km | |
|
The Honda Civic is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Civic. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 700 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.28 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.50 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 23 cm shorter than the Honda Civic, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 370 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.2 metres less than that of the Honda Civic. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`630 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Honda Civic has
| |