Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 145 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 10 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 11 HP less power than Mitsubishi Colt, but torque is 5 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.2 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 47 litres | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 22 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Smart ForFour, Mitsubishi Xpander | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 11 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1032 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |