Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Opel Meriva 2005

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2004 - 2006
Opel Meriva
2005 - 2010
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.6 Petrol1.6 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing beltTiming belt

Performance

Power: 98 HP105 HP
Torque: 150 NM150 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds13.3 seconds
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 7 HP less power than Opel Meriva, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.17.3
Real fuel consumption: 7.4 l/100km7.5 l/100km
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Meriva.
Fuel tank capacity: 55 litres52 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 770 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
930 km on highway890 km on highway
740 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Engine production duration: 14 years7 years
Engine spread: Used also on Mitsubishi LancerInstalled on at least 3 other car models, including Opel Astra, Opel Zafira, Opel Vectra
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.
Hydraulic tappets: yesno
The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure.

Dimensions

Length: 4.05 m4.04 m
Width: 1.72 m1.69 m
Height: 1.52 m1.62 m
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but lower.
Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm longer than the Opel Meriva, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: no data350 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1410 litres
Turning diameter: 10.4 meters10.5 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.1 metres less than that of the Opel Meriva.
Gross weight (kg): 1`2001`830
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 10002200
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • more dynamic
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Opel Meriva has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv