Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Toyota Corolla Verso 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 98 HP | 110 HP | |
| Torque: | 150 NM | 150 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Toyota Corolla Verso is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 12 HP less power than Toyota Corolla Verso, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.1 | 7.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 7.7 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 45 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Corolla Verso. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 770 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 930 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Corolla | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Corolla Verso might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Mitsubishi Space Star engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 4.24 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.61 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 19 cm shorter than the Toyota Corolla Verso, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 417 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres more than that of the Toyota Corolla Verso, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`200 | 1`695 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Corolla Verso has
| |