Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Toyota Yaris 2005
| Body: | Minivan / MPV | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 86 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 117 NM | 121 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Toyota Yaris is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 1 HP less power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 4 NM less than Toyota Yaris. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.0 | |
|
The Toyota Yaris is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Toyota Yaris engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 27 years | 26 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Mitsubishi Lancer, Mitsubishi Carisma, Mitsubishi Colt | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Space Star might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Toyota Yaris engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine: Engines with higher mileage tend to lose oil both through combustion and leaks, with consumption becoming noticeable past 150,000 km. Around the same time, the timing chain may stretch as the hydraulic ... More about Toyota Yaris 2005 1.3 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.05 m | 3.75 m | |
| Width: | 1.72 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.53 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger, but slightly lower. Mitsubishi Space Star is 30 cm longer than the Toyota Yaris, 2 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 275 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 9.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 metres more than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`135 | 900 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | high | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |