Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 vs Mitsubishi Space Star 2002
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 86 HP | 82 HP | |
Torque: | 117 NM | 120 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.4 seconds | 14.2 seconds | |
Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 engine produces 4 HP more power than Mitsubishi Space Star 2002, but torque is 3 NM less than Mitsubishi Space Star 2002. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.8 | 6.7 | |
Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Space Star 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 55 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 800 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 27 years | 27 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.05 m | 4.05 m | |
Width: | 1.72 m | 1.72 m | |
Height: | 1.52 m | 1.52 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Star 2004 and Mitsubishi Space Star 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | 1`135 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1000 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
| |