Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Toyota Yaris 2017
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 69 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15.3 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 11 HP more power than Toyota Yaris, whereas torque is 11 NM more than Toyota Yaris. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 6.0 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 30 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 42 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 970 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1100 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Toyota Yaris gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Star engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Citroen C1, Toyota Aygo, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Yaris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Yaris 2017 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.51 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 15 cm shorter than the Toyota Yaris, 3 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 347 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Toyota Yaris has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 112 litres less trunk space than the Toyota Yaris. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Toyota Yaris, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 14 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Yaris has
| |