Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Toyota Aygo 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 72 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.8 seconds | 15.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 8 HP more power than Toyota Aygo, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Toyota Aygo. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 2.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 4.2 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.4 l/100km | 5.4 l/100km | |
| By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Aygo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 35 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
| 640 km with real consumption | 640 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Mitsubishi Space Star engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 21 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Toyota Yaris, Citroen C1, Peugeot 107, Peugeot 108 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Aygo might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Toyota Aygo 2018 1.0 engine: Engine often vibrates and has difficulty starting in cold weather. Timing chain lifetime is not very long. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.47 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.62 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is larger. Mitsubishi Space Star is 33 cm longer than the Toyota Aygo, 5 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 168 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | no data | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Star has 67 litres more trunk space than the Toyota Aygo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 metres less than that of the Toyota Aygo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`370 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 12 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Toyota Aygo has
| |