Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Renault Clio 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 60 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 93 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 15 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 20 HP more power than Renault Clio, whereas torque is 13 NM more than Renault Clio. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 3.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 6.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 285 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Renault Clio. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 120 mm (4.7 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.81 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.64 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.42 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm shorter than the Renault Clio, 3 cm wider, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 255 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1035 litres | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star has 20 litres less trunk space than the Renault Clio. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Renault Clio (by 123 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.1 metres less than that of the Renault Clio, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Renault Clio has
| |