Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Opel Adam 2013
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.4 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 87 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 130 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 7 HP less power than Opel Adam, whereas torque is 24 NM less than Opel Adam. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Opel Adam. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 38 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 570 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.70 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.72 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star is 10 cm longer than the Opel Adam, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 170 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 663 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Mitsubishi Space Star has 65 litres more trunk space than the Opel Adam. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 249 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.6 metres less than that of the Opel Adam, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 1`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 7800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Opel Adam has
| |