Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Mitsubishi Colt 2008
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.1 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 100 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 13.2 seconds | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is more dynamic to drive. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 5 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 6 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 47 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 850 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 770 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 300'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Smart ForFour | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.94 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.55 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller. Mitsubishi Space Star is 15 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Colt, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 220 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 1032 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, Mitsubishi Space Star has 15 litres more trunk space than the Mitsubishi Colt. The Mitsubishi Colt may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Colt (by 120 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`340 | 1`450 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6200 | 2800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |