Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Mini Cooper 2018
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.2 Petrol | 1.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 80 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 106 NM | 220 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8 seconds | |
|
Mini Cooper is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 56 HP less power than Mini Cooper, whereas torque is 114 NM less than Mini Cooper. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 3.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.1 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.3 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 210 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mini Cooper. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 40 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 850 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 940 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| 660 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 14 years | 12 years | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mini Cooper engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.85 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.73 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.41 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 6 cm shorter than the Mini Cooper, 6 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 211 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
912 litres | 731 litres | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Mini Cooper may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 181 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.6 metres less than that of the Mini Cooper, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`340 kg | 1`565 kg | |
| Net weight: | 845 kg | 1`135 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 495 kg | 430 kg | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 13 procentiem more than Mini Cooper. Therefore, Mitsubishi Space Star is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Mini Cooper has
| |