Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Volkswagen Polo 2014
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 95 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 14.3 seconds | |
| Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 4 HP less power than Volkswagen Polo, whereas torque is 7 NM less than Volkswagen Polo. Despite less power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 6.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Polo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 930 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1070 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 730 km with real consumption | ||
| Volkswagen Polo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.97 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 18 cm shorter than the Volkswagen Polo, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 280 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 952 litres | |
|
Volkswagen Polo has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 45 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Polo. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volkswagen Polo (by 40 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.4 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Polo, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`570 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 6400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Volkswagen Polo has
| |