Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Suzuki Swift 2013

 
Mitsubishi Space Star
2016 - 2019
Suzuki Swift
2013 - 2017
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 1.0 Petrol1.2 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming chain

Performance

Power: 71 HP94 HP
Torque: 88 NM118 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13.6 seconds13.4 seconds
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving.
Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 23 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 4.25.5
Real fuel consumption: 5.0 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Mitsubishi Space Star is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 195 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift.
Fuel tank capacity: 35 litres40 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 830 km in combined cycle720 km in combined cycle
970 km on highway810 km on highway
700 km with real consumption660 km with real consumption
Mitsubishi Space Star gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
Ground clearance: 150 mm (5.9 inches)140 mm (5.5 inches)
Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 280'000 km350'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 14 years12 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 3.80 m3.85 m
Width: 1.67 m1.70 m
Height: 1.51 m1.54 m
Both cars are similar in size. Mitsubishi Space Star is 6 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 3 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres211 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down, if possible
912 litres528 litres
Mitsubishi Space Star has more luggage capacity.
Even though the car is shorter, The Suzuki Swift may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Mitsubishi Space Star (by 384 litres).
Turning diameter: 9.2 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 1.2 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight: 1`290 kg1`560 kg
Net weight:845 kg1`110 kg
Load capacity:445 kg450 kg
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
average
Average price (€): 46005600
Pros and Cons: Mitsubishi Space Star has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • higher ground clearance
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Suzuki Swift has
  • more power
  • has 4x4 drive
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv