Mitsubishi Space Star 2016 vs Suzuki Swift 2017
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.0 Petrol | 1.2 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 71 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 88 NM | 120 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.6 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
Suzuki Swift is a more dynamic driving. Mitsubishi Space Star engine produces 19 HP less power than Suzuki Swift, whereas torque is 32 NM less than Suzuki Swift. Due to the lower power, Mitsubishi Space Star reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.2 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.0 l/100km | 5.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift, which means that by driving the Mitsubishi Space Star over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Mitsubishi Space Star consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Suzuki Swift. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 35 litres | 37 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 970 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 710 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 150 mm (5.9 inches) | 115 mm (4.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mitsubishi Space Star can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mitsubishi Space Star version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 280'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Suzuki Swift engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Suzuki Baleno, Suzuki Ignis | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Suzuki Swift might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 3.80 m | 3.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.67 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.50 m | |
|
Mitsubishi Space Star is smaller, but slightly higher. Mitsubishi Space Star is 5 cm shorter than the Suzuki Swift, 7 cm narrower, while the height of Mitsubishi Space Star is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 265 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
912 litres | 947 litres | |
|
Suzuki Swift has more luggage space. Mitsubishi Space Star has 30 litres less trunk space than the Suzuki Swift. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Suzuki Swift (by 35 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 9.2 meters | 9.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Mitsubishi Space Star is 0.4 metres less than that of the Suzuki Swift, which means Mitsubishi Space Star can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`290 | 1`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 6800 | 13 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Mitsubishi Space Star has
|
Suzuki Swift has
| |